5 ms·
Advocates of anarchy are invariably those least-equipped to survive it.
by mordant 10y ago
Advocates of anarchy are invariably those least-equipped to survive it.
- ue_ 10y agoAnarchy does not mean "anything goes", it is the rejection of the class system and systems of unjustified authority and people being free to make voluntary associations with the abolition of money, private property and implementation of direct democracy in those voluntary institutions. I'm not quite sure what you want to get at.
- simonh 10y agoIf people are forced not to be able to use money, I don't see how that's free. The reality is that most of the things Anarchists want to abolish, the vast majority of people of their own free will actually want to keep.
- ue_ 10y ago>If people are forced not to be able to use money, I don't see how that's free. This along with other things are oft-repeated myths about Communism. The goal is to eliminate money by eliminating the need that creates it: that is, wage labour and artificial scarcity. You are free to use money. You are not free to exploit people. That is to say, you would not be allowed to profit by the work of others by collecting their surplus value. It is equivalent to stealing (unless both parties give informed consent). However there would be no need for anyone to engage in wage labour, because people would no lonver be forced to work for their survival.
- simonh 10y agoIt's a shame Marx never explained how those needs would actually be met.
- ue_ 10y agoIf I'm correct, Marx always viewed his task as one to criticise the capitalist system and analyse it in terms of the history leading up to it, rather than define how a Communistic society ought to be implemented. Marx is quoted as having said that Communism is an ideal to strive toward rather than one to be implemented directly per se. Fewer people would have to work under a post-capitalist mode of production. I don't know how it's decided who works, but generally those with the appropriate skill would share labour amongst themselves, and people would be trained in the education system to do the jobs required by society. Again, the number of these jobs will be relatively small due to massive automation, which will occur at an increasing pace compared to the current capitalist system (in which too much automation means less profit, because goods are bought back using wages).
- LyndsySimon 10y agoOut of curiosity, how many anarchists do you know, and how well would you say you know them?