3 ms·
see another comment because it is a period that lends itself to showing a stronger increase than exist. the simple truth is that nearly every model still shows
by Shivetya 10y ago
see another comment because it is a period that lends itself to showing a stronger increase than exist. the simple truth is that nearly every model still shows more warming than has occurred.
there were some wonderful events in the 1880s, including one of the most amazing snow storms the NY area ever saw, can you imagine fifty foot drifts?
still there is a lot of warming but when we focus on per capita it allows many of the true violators to escape notice (Read Asia (china/india/etc)). plus looking at many sources the impact of C02 ranges from 10 to 30% so how can you factor in somethings whose range is so great. I still think a lot of industrialized raising of livestock isn't fairly accounted for as methane is more dangerous than CO2
just for fun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_of_1886%E2%80%9387 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_of_1886%E2%80%9387
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_1886_blizzard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_1886_blizzard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Blizzard_of_1888 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Blizzard_of_1888
though Buffalo would again see thirty to forty foot drifts in 1977