>I may be in the minority with this here, but I mostly agree with this post. Which part of this incoherence are you most fond of? * The part where he gives an

>I may be in the minority with this here, but I mostly agree with this post. Which part of this incoherence are you most fond of? * The part where he gives an example of "simple" python 2 hello world and pretends that the equivalent python 3 isn't exactly the same thing with two added brackets ( ) ? * The example he does give instead which isn't even valid python. * The part at the end where he gets confused between type safety and static typing and declares a preference for C based upon that.