> Rob is mostly arguing for the first and not for giving them positions of power purely based on their gender. No, he is not, from the article: > It may take

> Rob is mostly arguing for the first and not for giving them positions of power purely based on their gender. No, he is not, from the article: > It may take proactive behavior, like choosing a women over a man when growing your team, just because, or promoting women more freely. It's there, black on white (and already mentioned several times in this thread). Illegal (!!) discriminatory hiring and promotion practices are exactly what is advocated by the article.