4 ms·
> not everyone can meaningfully contribute to something that can't be done more efficiently by automation I don't know if this statement is true, but a lot mo
by greyman 10y ago
> not everyone can meaningfully contribute to something that can't be done more efficiently by automation
I don't know if this statement is true, but a lot more jobs could be created in the area of teaching, caring for elderly and ill people, etc.
- rorykoehler 10y agoI wonder if compulsory national service in these areas for individuals who don't contribute over x% or $yy.. in personal income tax a year would work?
- coldpie 10y agoThe last person I want teaching or caring for my old body is someone being forced to do so. Rather, we should increase the incentive for people to train in those areas by increasing their wages.
- rorykoehler 10y agoMy idea is more an incentive to get the wealthy to pay their fair share of taxes so we can find initiatives like you suggest.
- LoSboccacc 10y agoStill it's reasonable to expect the transition to a post scarcity society within the next two generations, at least not globally in the first phase but the growth boom will cause a new wave of hyperexpansionism to secure the growing lands and resource depots. Jobs as care worker won't be enough and not everyone is good/motivated in them and I don't think you don't realize how bad it is for the cared to have a spiteful worker There's a huge issue looming as the current mainstream libertarian model is ill suited for a post scarcity society plus there's gonna be a huge problem with migrations ready to compound with internal strifes. Nothing impossible to solve with preparation but seems we gonna reach that point fastly and badly.