That's irrelevant. Whatever rumors or gossip you may have heard about Koch. What you think scientists should be working on. Particularly misplaced is your baffl

That's irrelevant. Whatever rumors or gossip you may have heard about Koch. What you think scientists should be working on. Particularly misplaced is your baffling comparison with Kaku. Koch, a longtime professor at Caltech with over 80,000 citations on the field vs a complete and utter outsider, as well as crackpots on HN, as though their expertise is somewhat equivalent. In the story at hand, Koch came up with a new tracing technique, found a remarkable structure. That's what the article is about.