Scoble is being a jerk about this whole thing, a classic blog jerk. First, he publishes a lie that he should have known was a lie. Then, he got contacted by bo

Scoble is being a jerk about this whole thing, a classic blog jerk. First, he publishes a lie that he should have known was a lie. Then, he got contacted by both Schrage and Zuck. So, does he edit his post or add a disclaimer to the top? Of course not! Only a journalist would check with the accused first, and only a journalist would correct the story in a meaningful way. But Scoble is a blogger, so he adds the emails he got from FB to the end of the blog. And what is the net effect of this? It's two-fold: 1) many people will never get to the correction part 2) those who do will see resolute Scoble posting the rebuttal at the end, but that's just because he's an honorable blogger.. of course the gist of the story is right, or he would have changed it, right? Right? :(