3 ms·

So despite having spied on anyone who caught their fancy in the past- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/13/uber-employees-spying-ex-partners-poli

So despite having spied on anyone who caught their fancy in the past- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/13/uber-employees-spying-ex-partners-politicians-beyonce https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/13/uber-empl... -your bar for skepticism/reproach is only cleared with proof that they've done the exact same thing before, telegraphing their intentions along the way? Ok.

dllthomas 10y ago
That article alleges poor controls around customer data, not coordinated action. It seems unrelated to what we were discussing, which was likelihood of Uber to - reusing my earlier phrasing - try to discredit, disparage, or defame Susan Fowler.
- alphonsegaston 10y ago
  Well, you should still probably quit because they already send thugs to intimidate women/former employees in the way you said was unacceptable: https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/former-uber-worker-claims-company-investigator-illegally-ent?utm_term=.cpLlJ2jW5o#.han4xBQzM7 https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/former-uber-worker-cl...
  - dllthomas 10y ago
    There's some clear differences, and it's alleged not confirmed. That said, I'll look into it.