3 ms·
Yeah it's a bit more complex than that... The disk "IOPS" number on the box doesn't translate 1:1 or even linearly to number of committed durable transactions p
by g0del_was_wr0ng 10y ago
Yeah it's a bit more complex than that... The disk "IOPS" number on the box doesn't translate 1:1 or even linearly to number of committed durable transactions per second. You should try this with postgres and see how it goes.
- qaq 10y agoIf you land me 30K for the hardware I would be glad to do it :). For writing WAL it scales reasonably close to linear