4 ms·

I agree, her movements are very decisive. This does not look like somebody carrying out a prank.

• PDoyle 10y ago
  <sigh> All the instant body-language experts. Let's convict her because her motions on a blurry security cam definitely rule out "nervously pulling a prank on a stranger" and are only consistent with "highly sophisticated international assassin with no escape plan".
  • joosters 10y ago
    No need to over-react. You're the only one talking about convicting her based on the video. It's perfectly fine for people to comment on what we see.
  • tyingq 10y ago
    This story, if true, does seem to point to some complicity: http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/02/18/killer-women-recruited-by-a-man-three-months-ago/ http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/02/18/killer-wome... Mentions being recruited months ago, and practice sessions that included injecting the victim. I don't know that a reasonable person would conclude that an injection was a normal thing to do in a prank. Of course, news is often misreported, so yeah...innocent until proven guilty. But people will speculate, and there are some things that feel fishy.