4 ms·
Well, two out of the three people proposing that document work for Cloudflare. The other works for Dyn. It's clear what their motivation is. And this is not the
by fapjacks 10y ago
Well, two out of the three people proposing that document work for Cloudflare. The other works for Dyn. It's clear what their motivation is. And this is not the first time they've filed a document just like that, and it will expire this year just like it has in the past. That document is bullshit. It's trying to now change the standard after they've already broken their DNS implementations.
- chrisbolt 10y agoYour comment doesn't address ANY of the arguments you're replying to. Are ANY queries typically used outside of attacks, scraping, or diagnosis? Is there a reason they need to be served over UDP? > Well, two out of the three people proposing that document work for Cloudflare. The other works for Dyn. Two companies that have some experience with dealing with DNS attacks. Their motivation may be self-serving, but they're not the ones doing the attacking.
- fapjacks 10y agoNo, they're the ones tossing the standard and then trying to retroactively change it. Cloudflare sucks.