2 ms·
It's a decent start, and works for quite a few stories. However, it'll need to be used with other solutions in order to cover various other cases where this doe
by CM30 10y ago
It's a decent start, and works for quite a few stories. However, it'll need to be used with other solutions in order to cover various other cases where this doesn't help. Such as:
1. Where it's the object in a photo that needs to be confirmed as real. For example, a fair few sites will take pictures/scans of magazine or newspaper articles, and this wouldn't help in those cases (since it only says the photo is of a real object).
2. Where the photo isn't taken with a camera. For example, a lot of entertainment journalism (like for movies and TV shows) and almost all gaming journalism requires capture cards to get the screenshots, not a camera. So something like this that could be adapted to these use cases would be nice to see as well.
3. And finally, where the image is real but used in a misleading way. Time and place stamps help here, but still leave room for manipulation by careful camera angles and what not.
But still, it seems like an interesting tool none the less.