Ha.ha. Did I mention I'm not in marketing? I do appreciate your passion! On your first point. There is a very strong risk of inadvertent misconfiguration or y

Ha.ha. Did I mention I'm not in marketing? I do appreciate your passion! On your first point. There is a very strong risk of inadvertent misconfiguration or your employees not following best practices.. Or even poor documentation. Google cloud by default gives you a global secure vpc that never traverses public internet, so there's less risk because the baseline of security is high. Sure, you can run VPN tunnels between data centers. Point is, with Google cloud you don't need to. On the latter point, of course you cannot eradicate every vendor, especially within the obvious context of this specific Intel announcement... But, again, not having three dozen flavors of configs and four network router vendors does make a difference. I would encourage you to read the paper I linked to above (discussed this topic in great detail), and also perhaps [0]. Also security folks at Google, who are much more qualified to discuss this topic than I am, frequently post on hn. [1] [0] https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/02/Google-seeks-new-disks-for-data-centers.html?m=1 https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2016/02/Google-seeks-ne... [1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13388941 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13388941