Chicago has no-go zones, and no-go zones are always bad. The difference here is that Sweden is creating new no-go zones. However that happens (in this case imm

Chicago has no-go zones, and no-go zones are always bad. The difference here is that Sweden is creating new no-go zones. However that happens (in this case immigration) it is really bad. If a government policy would create new no-go zones, then that government policy is bad. Stop it! Fixing the older no-go zones is a different problem. It is important, but a lower priority than not creating new no-go zones. It's like... close the plug in the bottom of your boat before worrying about the water that is already there.