3 ms·

This is a new one to me...the referenced paper is here: http://cs.yale.edu/homes/thomson/publications/calvin-sigmod12.pdf http://cs.yale.edu/homes/thomson/publi

• evanweaver 10y ago
  That's a good and complicated question. They both are fully ACID-compliant systems. The biggest difference as a developer is that Calvin never blocks reads, contested or not. You get causally consistent single-replica reads with no coordination. This makes the read performance equivalent to something like Cassandra at CONSISTENCY.ONE, without giving up the cross-partition write linearization of something like Spanner.
  • imglorp 10y ago
    Can Calvin scale beyond the OP claim? I've personally seen a Cassandra ring go to more than 2M ops/sec.
    • jchrisa 10y ago
      Yes. This isn't near the top end, more like what happens when we run benchmarks on a reasonable web infrastructure class cluster. This is still only 5 machines in each datacenter.