4 ms·
Interesting not to see csh/tcsh there. I'm out of the loop when it comes to these things; is it pretty much dead? Did bash 'win'?
by tbrake 10y ago
Interesting not to see csh/tcsh there. I'm out of the loop when it comes to these things; is it pretty much dead? Did bash 'win'?
- tambourine_man 10y agoI still have a soft spot for tcsh for historical reasons, but yes, bash pretty much won. Specially now with Microsoft's Bash on Windows
- kps 10y agoNor ksh, which was the common shell for the SVr4 line (Solaris et al.). It has some extensions to sh that bash picked up, some that bash imitated just badly enough to be incompatible, and some that bash never picked up (e.g. floating point expressions, which I use surprisingly often). The terminal emulator I use, mlterm, isn't on the list either. Its killer feature for me is a configuration that solves the vim ESC/Alt prefix problem.