If openness is good than radicalization is necessary. With out Stallman and his breed the conversation becomes: 100% closed vs some openness in some cases. Wh

If openness is good than radicalization is necessary. With out Stallman and his breed the conversation becomes: 100% closed vs some openness in some cases. Which is a conversation clearly biased in favor of closed. Right now 100% closed is seen as completely sane and normal and reasonable, but 100% open is considered crazy extremism. So as of today Open is still losing, and Stallman is still good.