3 ms·
100M is an exaggeration but still I think that's fine. Enable people doing research for the benefit of others access to their stuff, but if someone is going to
by jghn 10y ago
100M is an exaggeration but still I think that's fine. Enable people doing research for the benefit of others access to their stuff, but if someone is going to get rich off of it why not take a cut?
- hprotagonist 10y agono, it's about right... https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsherkow/2017/02/21/how-much-is-a-crispr-patent-license-worth/#34b798e86b77 https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsherkow/2017/02/21/how-muc... https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-24/the-gene-editing-tool-on-every-drugmaker-s-wish-list-this-year https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-24/the-gene-...
- jghn 10y agoI was assuming they meant in general, not just CRSPR. $100m would be an enormous amount of money for the Broad and they license all kinds of stuff regularly