You didn't read it carefully enough. It did exist. It read: "Yes, that is kind of funny way of saying that there's no reason why Python 2 and Python 3 can't c

You didn't read it carefully enough. It did exist. It read: "Yes, that is kind of funny way of saying that there's no reason why Python 2 and Python 3 can't coexist other than the Python project's incompetence and arrogance. Obviously it's theoretically possible to run Python 2 in Python 3, but until they do it then they have decided to say that Python 3 cannot run one other Turing complete language so logically Python 3 is not Turing complete. I should also mention that as stupid as that sounds, actual Python project developers have told me this, so it's their position that their own language is not Turing complete." See: http://web.archive.org/web/20161123042252/https://learnpythonthehardway.org/book/nopython3.html http://web.archive.org/web/20161123042252/https://learnpytho...