3 ms·
Technically, he was emphasizing how low the probability was, not the risk. Since the impact is pretty high in both cases (accepting a malicious object/mid-air c
by falsedan 10y ago
Technically, he was emphasizing how low the probability was, not the risk. Since the impact is pretty high in both cases (accepting a malicious object/mid-air collision), the risk (as a combination of probability & impact) is significant.
- falsedan 10y agoHi downvoters, without some post setting me straight I will be wrong forever, where can I learn more about risk analysis and mitigation?
- braveo 10y agoI think you're getting downvoted because while you may not necessarily be wrong, you're also not really disagreeing with what I said, just making a distinction that isn't all that important (in the context of this conversation).