4 ms·
For a company that understands computers are very similar to fashion (their SVP of retail was poached from Burberry), they show a disappointing lack of foresigh
by dcw303 10y ago
For a company that understands computers are very similar to fashion (their SVP of retail was poached from Burberry), they show a disappointing lack of foresight by not keeping their taste makers happy.
Introducing OS X as the mobile Unix platform of choice on top of the first ever drop dead gorgeous notebook (The Powerbook G4 Titanium) declared Apple as the platform for discerning power users. Those power users could confidently brag about their systems, giving free advertising to non-power users. The halo effect of which can still be seen today, trickling down to Joe Coffee in your local cafe. How much longer that lasts in the wake of mis-steps like the touch bar is questionable though, even in the wake of massive unit sales to the broader public.
This article is about high end video / graphics users, and workstations are a slightly different use case. But not much. Once these users move off Mac, who is going to be left to champion the desktops?
- WayneBro 10y ago> ...declared Apple as the platform for discerning power users. Incorrect. There are plenty of discerning power users who prefer the power of a good UI over a good CLI. What you meant to say is "for power users who happen to use UNIX". Even at peak reality distortion Apple had a whole 6% share of the desktop market. Just enough to be annoying to the rest of the world. They definitely never had a monopoly on these so-called "discerning power users".