3 ms·
As I understand it that is usually (I don't know specifically about IL) about surreptitious recording. If the other party (the cop) is informed and continues t
by billswift 16y ago
As I understand it that is usually (I don't know specifically about IL) about surreptitious recording. If the other party (the cop) is informed and continues the interaction, you are covered. As I have written before, the 2-party consent rules are specifically for the benefit of low-lifes. Nothing prevents one party reporting what transpired in a conversation, all the anti-recording laws do is to allow liars to get away with it by not preserving an objective record.
- tptacek 16y ago"Hey, sir, I just need to tell you that I'm recording this for my rec---" "Turn it off. Now." "But---" "TURN IT OFF AND STEP OUT OF THE CAR." You're right, but not in a relevant way. (I have a very little bit of experience with this, though not with municipal police; a friend got assaulted because of this, too).