3 ms·
I think you'd have much better luck turning the rocket into some kind of a sabot round and spending a week compressing a bunch of air into huge tanks and launch
by msandford 10y ago
I think you'd have much better luck turning the rocket into some kind of a sabot round and spending a week compressing a bunch of air into huge tanks and launching it that way. That's how subs launch ICBMs.
The reason that's not done is that rockets aren't reliable enough yet and nobody wants to bet their billion dollar cargo on the engines starting the first time, every time. If you lose every 100th ICBM it's a bummer, but it doesn't make MAD not happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aPvGGvnAGQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aPvGGvnAGQ
- sandworm101 10y agoFor non-human spaceflight, a 1% loss is an option. Insurance ussually assumes a 5ish percent chance that the payload wont survive and another 5ish that it wont be delivered into the ideal orbit.
- throwayguestman 10y agonever mind the actual sums involved, 1% on top of 10% is a 10% increase in coverage. Is coverage inclusive of the time lost in labor as well?