3 ms·
Medium now charges $75 for custom domain
- ko3us 10y agoSuch a shame that a high cost is charged for custom domain handling. Such a huge price increase. Originally for free. Yes that wasn't sustainable. But $75?? You can buy a domain for $5pa Free SSL using LetsEncrypt. I get Medium are looking for a revenue model, but this is ridiculous. Why not provide enterprise blogging or something they can charge enterprise for. Take on the Wordpress kingdom and get into big business.
- reacharavindh 10y agoDon't know if I'd pay $75 for custom domain Medium when there are Hugo, Ghost, Pelican and such free great alternatives for static blogs. But, man do I really wish my work bought something like Medium and replaced the cumbersome Wiki pages. My own Wiki pages are ugly and a pain to manage tables, images and text.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- munchbunny 10y agoThat honestly doesn't feel too bad. $75 is a pretty low price to pay if you care enough about the custom domain and the branding capability that comes with it. Perhaps they could tier it so that there's a "vanity" tier and a "branding" tier, that way people who really just want the vanity URL can have it for cheaper.
- ishyFishy 10y ago$75 is roughly 11,495 LKR here, so it's not really cheap for the rest of us on the far side of the world. :/
- raleigh_user 10y agoCan confirm I opted out of the custom domain today when emailed back with the $75 charge. The cost isn't bad but it rubbed me the wrong way doing the form two months ago and heard nothing back until today. 15 emails/tweets unanswered. Completely understand charging but was turned off by the lack of response/acknowledgement.
- kuon 10y agoI can really understand medium.com needs for a decent revenue model. But a 75$ one time fee for a domain seems really a desperate measure to cash in. I'd be willing to pay, say 5$/month for premium service, including a custom domain, but a 75$ one time fee only for that is not justified to me.
- exclusiv 10y agoIt doesn't make sense to me. The more successful sites will be around longer - so $75/one-time probably means less lifetime value versus the $5/mo you suggested which I think makes more sense. But they probably need more cash sooner. And $75 one time will just push the masses to alternatives.