Oh, the irony runs much deeper than that. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21time

Oh, the irony runs much deeper than that. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.htm... My theory is that the Old Grey Lady is going senile. Their public editor wrote a piece in 2004 rejecting the idea of the paper of record. Oddly, he went on to become a decent historian. At the same time the paper was pressuring Archive.org to remove nytimes.com from the Archive. Yes, you heard that right: the New York Times has an explicit policy of removing itself from history in order to close down access to what it publishes. The final giggle is that Archive.org is run by Brewster Khale, the guy who got them onto the web in the first place. I've been watching them for years and, frankly, I think they have no idea what they are doing.