3 ms·
There are three components: facts, techniques, concepts. Being fluent with techniques is not strictly necessary, but is generally important and can aid in help
by cgriswald 10y ago
There are three components: facts, techniques, concepts.
Being fluent with techniques is not strictly necessary, but is generally important and can aid in helping to understand concepts by demonstrating relationships. But a student who prioritizes concepts is probably better off than one who only understands techniques.[0]
My objection to the article is that it is advocating memorizing facts. Figuring out that 3/5 == 0.6 is trivial if you already understand the concepts and knowing that 3/5 == 0.6 is pointless if you don't know what it means.
[0] - Anecdotally, I breezed through calc 1 in high school. First done with every test, always aced those tests, never studied. Had no idea what I was doing, because I was just memorizing and applying rules. Knowing just the techniques was equivalent to knowing nothing.
- discombobulate 10y ago> Had no idea what I was doing, because I was just memorizing and applying rules. Knowing just the techniques was equivalent to knowing nothing. I suppose so. If you wrote some code to carry out the rules, you wouldn't say the computer knows anything.
- dwringer 10y agoIf you were always first done and aced your tests, but think you had no idea what you were doing, then think how everyone else must have felt.