4 ms·

The first I heard of Wix was a few months ago when a local news site deployed their new design. The page would be completely blank for 10-15 seconds while it ma

by mcbits 10y ago

The first I heard of Wix was a few months ago when a local news site deployed their new design. The page would be completely blank for 10-15 seconds while it made hundreds of requests for useless little React turdlets. As far as I can tell, they "fixed" it by moving away from Wix. If that's normal for a Wix site, then I would say no, nobody involved on either side of the transaction is a web developer except in the most pejorative sense of the term.

yestoallthat 10y ago
I thought you were exaggerating, but holy cow... maybe those who disagree can find me a site from http://www.wix.com/explore/websites http://www.wix.com/explore/websites for which that doesn't hold true, because I gave up after a few which were all incredibly abysmal. Yeah, those sites are "stunning" alright. Aesthetically very bland and samey, but technically utterly stunning. I wouldn't even know how to make something that slow without using a combination of bmp images and sleeping here and there for a few seconds.
- mcbits 10y ago
  To be fair, I just tried a few of those sites and they're not as slow as the one I had in mind. But I wasn't exaggerating about that particular site. Each page view was taking at least 10 seconds to show the first pixel of content for what is effectively a static blog.
  - yestoallthat 10y ago
    Sounds like all 3 I clicked on.. they all loaded 150+ tiny files, and started out with several seconds of a white screen.
- vinay427 10y ago
  It doesn't help that they apparently couldn't bother to proofread the subtitle on that page. > With 1000s of stunning options, no two website are the same. "two website" => "two websites"
- true_religion 10y ago
  Worse, it happened with that page itself. It took 10 seconds before it loaded any content beyond the header and base template.
- cpeterso 10y ago
  It looks like Wix only tested that Explore page in Chrome and Edge. Clicking any of the "View Site" links opens two new tabs in Firefox and Safari, opens nothing in IE11, but works as expected in Chrome and Edge.
subpixel 10y ago
A few years ago every Wix site was Flash. So...progress, and apparently profit.
ehnto 10y ago
It's madness. I keep saying it, but this is basic UX stuff. Even using JIRA lately has become painful as components bounce all over the place while they sling in code asynchronously with no UX indication. Save a sub task and watch as the whole page jiggles about like it's trying to avoid being clicked. I will get you, edit button. You cannot escape my patient pointer.

by mcbits 10y ago

yestoallthat 10y ago

I thought you were exaggerating, but holy cow... maybe those who disagree can find me a site from http://www.wix.com/explore/websites http://www.wix.com/explore/websites for which that doesn't hold true, because I gave up after a few which were all incredibly abysmal. Yeah, those sites are "stunning" alright. Aesthetically very bland and samey, but technically utterly stunning. I wouldn't even know how to make something that slow without using a combination of bmp images and sleeping here and there for a few seconds.

mcbits 10y ago
To be fair, I just tried a few of those sites and they're not as slow as the one I had in mind. But I wasn't exaggerating about that particular site. Each page view was taking at least 10 seconds to show the first pixel of content for what is effectively a static blog.
- yestoallthat 10y ago
  Sounds like all 3 I clicked on.. they all loaded 150+ tiny files, and started out with several seconds of a white screen.
vinay427 10y ago
It doesn't help that they apparently couldn't bother to proofread the subtitle on that page. > With 1000s of stunning options, no two website are the same. "two website" => "two websites"
true_religion 10y ago
Worse, it happened with that page itself. It took 10 seconds before it loaded any content beyond the header and base template.
cpeterso 10y ago
It looks like Wix only tested that Explore page in Chrome and Edge. Clicking any of the "View Site" links opens two new tabs in Firefox and Safari, opens nothing in IE11, but works as expected in Chrome and Edge.

subpixel 10y ago

A few years ago every Wix site was Flash. So...progress, and apparently profit.

ehnto 10y ago

It's madness. I keep saying it, but this is basic UX stuff. Even using JIRA lately has become painful as components bounce all over the place while they sling in code asynchronously with no UX indication. Save a sub task and watch as the whole page jiggles about like it's trying to avoid being clicked. I will get you, edit button. You cannot escape my patient pointer.