4 ms·
> Then if people are positive about the article I will go back and read it. This strikes me as over-editing your intake feed and potentially missing out on inf
by davelnewton 10y ago
> Then if people are positive about the article I will go back and read it.
This strikes me as over-editing your intake feed and potentially missing out on information that you might be positive about, or take action on, or...
- Broken_Hippo 10y agoGotta start trimming the hedge somewhere. It isn't so much missing information as needing to pick and choose due to time constraints. Sometimes, it is more that the article is fairly technical and I can learn more about the subject from the comments. Sometimes enough to make more sense out of the article itself. Positive doesn't really mean happy: Positive in terms on content or good writing means the article is worth the time to read. "Long read but good" might mean to come back later. Surprisingly controversial topic? Yeah, probably should read, it'll be a positive thing to have in my brain. And so on and so forth.