3 ms·
>Seriously. For anything more than a single developer maven is the best build system I've ever used by a long way, because its customizability is so limited Th
by crdoconnor 10y ago
>Seriously. For anything more than a single developer maven is the best build system I've ever used by a long way, because its customizability is so limited
That, along with its horrible XML markup abortion, was exactly what I hated about it. Any behavior that was even moderately unusual was a monumental pain to implement.
Build scripts by their very nature need to be turing complete because the need for customization isn't rare enough.
>Beyond that there's a working central repository where all the important libraries are
Python got this 17 years ago, a good 4 years before maven even existed.
- bluejekyll 10y agoMaven is not a build script, it is a declarative build definition system. It is not supposed to be Turing complete, for things that need that customization, as the GP stated, you use extensions. For anyone who likes maven, checkout cargo in Rust. It got everything right, and made build extensions easier to integrate.
- lmm 10y ago> Build scripts by their very nature need to be turing complete. They really don't. The build process should be simple and the same for every project; any actual logic can go in first-class code, that's what it's for (whereas finding out that a file somehow wasn't built, or got substituted before being built, makes for an extremely unpleasant surprise when investigating an issue). I find Turing-complete build systems end up with an analogue of https://martinfowler.com/bliki/SnowflakeServer.html https://martinfowler.com/bliki/SnowflakeServer.html - the "snowflake build", where every module builds slightly differently.