3 ms·
Very interesting, though I'd love more details about the signals they're using. I hold out a slim hope that this discussion doesn't once again devolve into "bu
by jkaptur 10y ago
Very interesting, though I'd love more details about the signals they're using.
I hold out a slim hope that this discussion doesn't once again devolve into "but how can we even define 'truth'??" This seems more analogous to spam detectors - perfection is absolutely theoretically impossible, but low-error implementations are incredibly useful in practice.
- jerf 10y agoThis seems to be a tone detector, not a truth detector.