I wonder if this is really the case. Because if we can drive storage costs much closer to zero (e.g.: a beefed up local server), we can keep storing hashes and

I wonder if this is really the case. Because if we can drive storage costs much closer to zero (e.g.: a beefed up local server), we can keep storing hashes and the next collision should be much closer. Starting and stopping and throwing away the previous work does work out to $560K per collision, but doesn't it just keep getting cheaper if you keep going?