4 ms·
It's made public so people can discus and judge. Problem with this approach is that it will not only shame, but also mark a target for offenders, so it's not on
by creo 10y ago
It's made public so people can discus and judge. Problem with this approach is that it will not only shame, but also mark a target for offenders, so it's not only adjudication, it's a act of aggression. Think about police investigators. Why are they not publishing full names and faces of criminals?
EDIT
On second thought, public shaming is consequence of something more important. If race officials would pay for reporting legitimate offences there wouldn't be a need to ask for donations. So author could keep those investigations hidden.
- appleflaxen 10y agoThis is utterly factual. If the facts are shameful, that's on the person who created the facts about them, not on the reporter.