I think this is my only zero vote, ever. I'm amazed that a useful and practical (for our environment) suggestion was downvoted here; whereas I'd expect that if

I think this is my only zero vote, ever. I'm amazed that a useful and practical (for our environment) suggestion was downvoted here; whereas I'd expect that if Brietbart had a forum (which maybe they do, I rarely if ever visit the site.) Did someone not google and assume natural cellulose was obviously still used in filters? It isn't, it's synthetic, a polymer that doesn't degrade.