4 ms·
Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
- mrtron 16y agoBuilt by Xzibit?
- iamdave 16y agoYo dawg, I heard you like the internet, so we put a browser in your browser so you can meme while you meme
- chaosmachine 16y agoIt's neat, but I really expected some kind of iframe, so you could browse inside it.
- thunk 16y agoAnd of course the first page I'd visit with it would be itself. And again. And again.
- proexploit 16y agoI opened it up in Chrome first. I'd have lost my mind if Firefox was running in an iFrame. :)
- jarek 16y agoIt would have been nice if they didn't use so many -webkit- properties (I counted 34) so that other browsers could at least have a shot at rendering it. Several properties they use are supported by Opera if given the chance.
- thristian 16y agoIt's hardly "built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3" if they're using proprietary -webkit- properties rather than CSS3 properties.
- aliem 16y agosice CSS3 is still a work in progress browsers implement upcomig features using -webkit/-o/-moz there's nothing wrong with it (as long than you don't use the non-valid ie's filter crap) If you take a look here: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work you can clearly see that pretty much everything is in Working Draft state so isn't really stable
- jarek 16y agoIt may be valid according to the wording, but denying supported features to all but one rendering engine is certainly not compatible with the spirit of any web standard.
- drivebyacct 16y agoWhy is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods. // We help design agencies build websites and web applications. if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }
- ido 16y agoI read it as: if you prefer to use photoshop (i.e. you are a graphics designer that wants to just send a mock-up and have it implemented) you should contact them.
- puns 16y agoI think it's just their way of saying they're looking to hire a graphic designer as opposed to programmers, not their design philosophy.
- atanok 16y agoThe joke is that (TextMate || Coda) as any OR operation, returns either 0 or 1, so if Photoshop is >=2 then that if condition is always true, regardless of the value of TextMate and Coda.
- jfr 16y agoFirefox can do that as well: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul Ok... that is cheating...
- minalecs 16y agothe colors of the close, minimize and expand aren't correct, so not entirely accurate. Still awesome
- bombs 16y agoThey're correct if you have your appearance settings set to Graphite instead of Blue.
- TrevorBurnham 16y agoLooks awful on the iPad. I guess Safari Mobile still has some catching up to do with its desktop sibling.
- jay_kyburz 16y agoLooks awful on chrome too.
- vdm 16y agoPerfect on Chrome 5.0.375.38 beta Mac.
- lisper 16y agoIs the background also image-free? That seems much more impressive to me than the browser window (and the browser window is pretty impressive.)
- proexploit 16y agoIt's not image free, but it would technically be possible with CSS only (except for the kind of glow effect) albeit a nightmare to try.
- proexploit 16y agoThis makes me want to give it a try, but then I realize the amount of time involved...
- ronaldj 16y agoThis is dumb. This is awesome: http://ukijs.org/mail/index.html http://ukijs.org/mail/index.html
- bbot 16y agoMaybe a disclaimer in the title that it only works in Safari on Macs, so linux users don't waste their time clicking?
- luna 16y agoIn the real (physical) world (you remember, that infinitely large thing outside of your computer), this is simply called a "mirror". It's not producing something, it's looking itself in the mirror: attention: vanity is waiting!