2 ms·

There are scientists who dispute the existence of global warming, too. But on the subject of both disputed topics, I will go ahead and go with the consensus o

There are scientists who dispute the existence of global warming, too. But on the subject of both disputed topics, I will go ahead and go with the consensus of 99.99% of experts and witnesses.

sharpray 10y ago
99.99% of the experts are only 4: Yehuda Bauer, Yitzak Arad, Jean-Claude Pressac and Raul Hilberg. Have you read their books to see what exactly they think happened? I have and they do not think as low of revisionists as you seem to. There is no need to be emotional about this subject. We're all interested in the truth. Read Arad's sources' testimonies for yourself and see if you believe then fully (it includes bears and eagles attacking Jews in cages) and then ask yourself how likely it is that those testimonies are the correct ones versus those of the formar camp inmates who defend there were no gas chambers. All those tesimonies are available onlinr, sometimes with video of the inmate him/herself telling their story.
- typetypetype 10y ago
  Because perhaps the inmates that saw the gas chambers did not get a chance to provide testimonials?
- knodi123 10y ago
  There are about a billion things I enjoy in life more than debating with holocaust deniers. There is mountains of definitive evidence of the existence of gas chambers, and if you aren't aware of that, it's because you're desperately trying not to be. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#Use_of_gas_chambers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#... I have no more to say on the subject to you. I recognize that such angry and dismissive attitudes are not the most effective way to change the minds of nazi apologists, but frankly, that's not my job, so the world will have to move on without waiting for you to open your eyes.
  - knz 10y ago
    > debating with holocaust deniers. There is mountains of definitive evidence of the existence of gas chambers The stupid thing about this argument is that many of the victims were killed in their communities by groups like the Einsatzgruppen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Death_squads_.281941.E2.80.931943.29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Death_squads_.28...). Suggesting that the absence of gas chambers (that were destroyed by the Germans) as evidence that the Holocaust didn't happen is just ignorance. There are mountains of photographic evidence to support the Holocaust (this one always haunts me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#/media/File:Jew_Killings_in_Ivangorod_(1942).jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#/media/File:Jew_...). I don't know how anyone can look at an image like this and feel nothing.

There are scientists who dispute the existence of global warming, too. But on the subject of both disputed topics, I will go ahead and go with the consensus of 99.99% of experts and witnesses.

sharpray 10y ago

99.99% of the experts are only 4: Yehuda Bauer, Yitzak Arad, Jean-Claude Pressac and Raul Hilberg. Have you read their books to see what exactly they think happened? I have and they do not think as low of revisionists as you seem to. There is no need to be emotional about this subject. We're all interested in the truth. Read Arad's sources' testimonies for yourself and see if you believe then fully (it includes bears and eagles attacking Jews in cages) and then ask yourself how likely it is that those testimonies are the correct ones versus those of the formar camp inmates who defend there were no gas chambers. All those tesimonies are available onlinr, sometimes with video of the inmate him/herself telling their story.

typetypetype 10y ago
Because perhaps the inmates that saw the gas chambers did not get a chance to provide testimonials?
knodi123 10y ago
There are about a billion things I enjoy in life more than debating with holocaust deniers. There is mountains of definitive evidence of the existence of gas chambers, and if you aren't aware of that, it's because you're desperately trying not to be. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#Use_of_gas_chambers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#... I have no more to say on the subject to you. I recognize that such angry and dismissive attitudes are not the most effective way to change the minds of nazi apologists, but frankly, that's not my job, so the world will have to move on without waiting for you to open your eyes.
- knz 10y ago
  > debating with holocaust deniers. There is mountains of definitive evidence of the existence of gas chambers The stupid thing about this argument is that many of the victims were killed in their communities by groups like the Einsatzgruppen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Death_squads_.281941.E2.80.931943.29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#Death_squads_.28...). Suggesting that the absence of gas chambers (that were destroyed by the Germans) as evidence that the Holocaust didn't happen is just ignorance. There are mountains of photographic evidence to support the Holocaust (this one always haunts me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#/media/File:Jew_Killings_in_Ivangorod_(1942).jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust#/media/File:Jew_...). I don't know how anyone can look at an image like this and feel nothing.