3 ms·

Yes, some of those people are simply wrong or "useful idiots", instead of being nazis.

• sharpray 10y ago
  Did you examine all of those people's claims? Even Raul Hilberg thanked revisionists for helping him come to terms with the fact there was no Hitler order (for the extermination), which he said there was in the first edition of his madterpiece, but then retracted in the second edition, among other corrections. Smugness and pretending to know what you don't does not help anything, especially to defuse racism and ulterior motives. Raul Hilberg understood that, which is why in his second book about the sources of the holocaust, he admits most of the narrative is based on testimonies and that there are no susbstantial documents to support it. He came a long way from his first impressions on his subject. I doubt you even knew he published a second book, with all due respect.
  • WillyOnWheels 10y ago
    Are you saying Hilberg concluded Hitler was not dedicated to extermination of the jews, because his research was based on oral testimonies? This sounds like an argument that belongs in https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitWehraboosSay/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitWehraboosSay/