4 ms·
There are many answers to this question, that have been rehashed elsewhere. Everything from citizens having more vested interest (skin in the game) in the futur
by thraway2016 10y ago
There are many answers to this question, that have been rehashed elsewhere. Everything from citizens having more vested interest (skin in the game) in the future of their lands than noncitizens, to the protection of shared cultural heritage, to social cohesion borne of cultural integration and higher-trust societies, etc.
But I'm genuinely interested in answers to my questions devoid of appeal to emotion, not deflection to other questions.
- literallycancer 10y ago> Everything from citizens having more vested interest (skin in the game) in the future of their lands than noncitizens An illegal immigrant from a poor country sells everything, and by a stroke of luck is successful in coming to the US. Then they spend some time there (say 15 years). Surely they have more to lose than a legal qualified immigrant (now a citizen) that spent some 8 years jumping through the hoops? The qualified immigrant could just pick a country at random and have reasonable chance of starting over, while the minimum wage illegal can't do the same (and so has to hope the country doesn't crap itself). >protection of shared cultural heritage How much cultural heritage does a white protestant factory worker share with an illegal Chinese immigrant? Is it more or less than they share with legal Chinese programmer who had recently been granted a citizenship?