4 ms·

True, but it'd be especially painful if you use a password manager. Presumably they're going to demand the master password, so you're left changing everything.

True, but it'd be especially painful if you use a password manager. Presumably they're going to demand the master password, so you're left changing everything. If you were dealing with a reasonable system, a compromise might be to unlock the accounts for them (without them seeing the password) and allow them to review the contents in your presence. That way you know exactly what they've seen, and that they're not holding onto anything, but they should still be able to do any necessary screening. Unfortunately the system appears to be weighted rather more toward maximum intimidation than reasonableness.

literallycancer 10y ago
>True, but it'd be especially painful if you use a password manager. Presumably they're going to demand the master password, so you're left changing everything. So you have to change everything + the master password, that is 1 more than you would have to change, had you not used it. Without a password manager, you could just give them the passwords they wanted, if you remember 20+ different random passwords. Otherwise you are reusing your passwords and so have to change most of them anyway. >If you were dealing with a reasonable system That this could seriously be described as "reasonable" shows just how much things went wrong.
- tempestn 10y ago
  I use a password manager and certainly wouldn't stop because of this, but no, without one you only have to change the passwords you give them. That would be a handful of passwords to SM accounts and such. If I give them my master password I have to change ALL my passwords. I have several hundred passwords stored. And yes, I agree that having to show border guards your facebook account isn't ideal. It's a hell of a lot more reasonable than just giving them all your passwords and having them run rampant through your digital life without your even knowing what they've done or seen though.

literallycancer 10y ago

>True, but it'd be especially painful if you use a password manager. Presumably they're going to demand the master password, so you're left changing everything. So you have to change everything + the master password, that is 1 more than you would have to change, had you not used it. Without a password manager, you could just give them the passwords they wanted, if you remember 20+ different random passwords. Otherwise you are reusing your passwords and so have to change most of them anyway. >If you were dealing with a reasonable system That this could seriously be described as "reasonable" shows just how much things went wrong.

tempestn 10y ago
I use a password manager and certainly wouldn't stop because of this, but no, without one you only have to change the passwords you give them. That would be a handful of passwords to SM accounts and such. If I give them my master password I have to change ALL my passwords. I have several hundred passwords stored. And yes, I agree that having to show border guards your facebook account isn't ideal. It's a hell of a lot more reasonable than just giving them all your passwords and having them run rampant through your digital life without your even knowing what they've done or seen though.