5 ms·
> Can't do it? Dunning-Kruger just reared its ugly head again. @stcredzero, I've seen your name pop up time and again on this thread. I don't think you realize
by jdlshore 10y ago
> Can't do it? Dunning-Kruger just reared its ugly head again.
@stcredzero, I've seen your name pop up time and again on this thread. I don't think you realize how rude you're being.
You clearly think that Data Structures 101 is important knowledge, to the point of saying that most software project failures are caused by lack of that knowledge. Others in this thread take a more moderate position.
Can you accept that this is a difference of opinion, not a sign of incompetence, and stop being so rude about it?
- stcredzero 10y agoI don't think you realize how rude you're being. I am being what I need to be. I find it remarkable that some people are receiving this information and prioritizing protecting their ego, rather than investigating what motivates such sentiments. Perhaps that difference should be exploited in interviews? You clearly think that Data Structures 101 is important knowledge, to the point of saying that most software project failures are caused by lack of that knowledge. Others in this thread take a more moderate position. Let me clarify: I think that Data Structures 101 is important knowledge, to the point of saying that a significant number of software project failures are caused by lack of that knowledge. Others in this thread take a more moderate position. They either don't have the knowledge and don't appreciate what they don't know. Classic Dunning-Kruger. Or, they have the knowledge but haven't been in the right kind of projects where someone not knowing really bit them hard. ("It never happened to me, so it must not be that big a deal.") Find me someone who has the knowledge and who has been "bit hard." You can find them in these threads. Read what they say carefully. It's much more than a matter of opinionated debate.