3 ms·
> What? If anything Windows is known for never being willing to break old versions of things Windows breaks horribly between upgrades. I know many people still
by daurnimator 10y ago
> What? If anything Windows is known for never being willing to break old versions of things
Windows breaks horribly between upgrades. I know many people still using windows 7 because they're afraid to upgrade.
I remember this thread from last week too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13603837 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13603837
- BoorishBears 10y ago"Breaking" in that sense isn't the same as in the sense my posts are talking about. It's "breaking" in the sense of compatibility. If an app runs on Win 7 and Win 10, Win 10 didn't break compatibility between Win7 and Win 10 because an upgrade doesn't go through properly. And while I have heard plenty of issues with upgrades, I've also personally had 0 issues with them since 7, on any of my personal machines, even some in the insider track. Even in the thread you link to almost every other response is in line with what I mean: "it's usually very very hard to accidentally make a program run on Windows version N but not on Windows Version N+1"
- tornadoboy55 10y agoSo does Linux. Before I had a MacBook I tried Ubuntu on my PC twice (this is back in 2007 and another time in 2011) and both times an upgrade made Ubuntu unbootable(!). These days its nicer, but the 'Linux is more stable' myth is only true if you stick to servers/CLI. Desktop its Mac > Windows > Linux and on laptops its Mac >> Windows >>>>>>>>>>> Linux