> Why do you think it's labourious? It's just LaTeX -- see the source code for that page. I wouldn't say "just LaTex", not in the way I mean when I use MathJax

> Why do you think it's labourious? It's just LaTeX -- see the source code for that page. I wouldn't say "just LaTex", not in the way I mean when I use MathJax, in which case one can insert normal LaTeX in plain-text form, such as \begin{equation} (equation) \end{equation}, or $$(equation)$$, without requiring the use of special tags. > They just need to adjust the generated PNGs to have a transparent background. Yes, but apart from that they render rather badly and don't scale. But I know there are good arguments against loading a math processor for the possibility that there might be mathematical content in someone's page.