4 ms·
There is no subtlety in Pence's actions on the needle program. PS: Bernie would've been the sane choice for your country. But hey, what can you do in a two par
by Mithaldu 10y ago
There is no subtlety in Pence's actions on the needle program.
PS: Bernie would've been the sane choice for your country. But hey, what can you do in a two party system.
- flukus 10y agoYou avoided the question entirely, does your vote for Clinton mean you implicitly agree to bombing children in Syria?
- Mithaldu 10y agoI'm not entirely sure how exactly you get to that exact end result from her. To answer that i'd need to know more. Think you can provide an explanation?
- flukus 10y agoOK, let's avoid hypotheticals entirely. I'm going to assume you voted for Obama? If so, does that mean that you implicitly agree to everyone killed (guilty and innocent) by his orders?
- Mithaldu 10y agoI didn't vote for anyone, i'm a German. As to the question: I don't believe any other candidate would've had less people dead in the relevant conflict areas. Further, Obama himself wasn't actively aiming to have civilians suffer through his actions. Pence has unequivocally done so. There's a wide gulf between deaths caused despite one's best intentions, and deaths caused directly by one's intentions. I believe US laws put such deaths in two distinct categories. E: I also answered the syria question in a post further up.
- mozumder 10y agoI voted for Obama, and yes, I agree with his orders.