3 ms·
I think I see what you're saying, but... ...when has it ever actually helped to attack them? Also, +1 for: > But the truth is that tolerance is advancing rapi
by RangerScience 10y ago
I think I see what you're saying, but...
...when has it ever actually helped to attack them?
Also, +1 for:
> But the truth is that tolerance is advancing rapidly and it is disorienting for people who've never had to practice it much.
- GVIrish 10y agoWhat I was trying to get at, is that sometimes people use the word 'attacking' when other people are shouting down and being mean and nasty to people who hold a different viewpoint than them. But other times people say 'attacking' when people are calling out bigotry in a completely appropriate way. Like, yeah you're going to catch heat for calling the FLOTUS an ape in heels. I'd agree that attacking in a mean and nasty way is rarely productive. But there's also a place for loudly condemning hatefulness and ignorance, usually when we're talking about public figures who are willfully divisive or hateful. If David Duke decides to hold a white power rally I don't think it's inappropriate for people to loudly protest someone like him. Or a politician getting in front of a crowd talking about 'legitimate rape'.