4 ms·
This is the information I came to find. Thanks!
by JonRB 10y ago
This is the information I came to find. Thanks!
- xs 10y agoWhy would such a small, simple program need to be 64 bit? Exactly what changes when moving puTTY from 32 bit to 64 bit? It now takes up more memory?
- rb12345 10y agoThe most likely reason is ASLR support, since you have more address space available for randomisation. Other than that, you can probably get a slight boost in performance from the differences between x64 and x86, but lose out if the code is particularly pointer-heavy.
- gfody 10y agoWe are well beyond moving to 64bit on a needs-only basis. At this point it's about dropping legacy and future proofing. There's also no reason 64bit apps should have a larger memory footprint; the ISA and addressing modes are actually much tidier.
- executesorder66 10y agoHere are the reasons they now provide a 64bit version: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/win64-binaries.html http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/w...