4 ms·
> Yes, by realizing that he won because of his economics, not his social positions. You're responding to a post by sama where he interviews people who voted fo
by gizmo 10y ago
> Yes, by realizing that he won because of his economics, not his social positions.
You're responding to a post by sama where he interviews people who voted for Trump, and his findings match what we already knew: this wasn't about economics. Why would it be when unemployment is below 5%? Just look at the answers people gave when asked "What do you like about Trump".
- lowpro 10y agoQuoting the unemployment rate at 4.9% is disingenuous at it doesn't look at the participation rate, which has dropped 3% in the past 10 years (aka 10 million people). This unemployment rate also doesn't look at individual regions like the rust belt, which won Trump the election. There's a sizable group that did vote him in on his social positions, which is the common 40% of voters (the battle for an election isn't concerned with the 'base' which is about 80% of the voters, being 40% left and 40% right, it worries about the 20% in the middle, and those middle voters were the rust belt that swayed the election). So although you can say a many Trump voters wanted his social politics, he won because of his economics. And I understand the selection of the narratives the author used. Like I've said, I live in a small Midwest town.