2 ms·
I agree with most of the above sentiment, but there's a little more context to the mocking of the disabled reporter. He'd been using those motions to mock peop
by rrauenza 10y ago
I agree with most of the above sentiment, but there's a little more context to the mocking of the disabled reporter. He'd been using those motions to mock people (who are backpedaling) in general for quite some time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgaC0leEb68 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgaC0leEb68
- st3v3r 10y agoI don't buy it. He knew what he was doing, he knew it was wrong, and he did it anyway.
- mcphage 10y ago> He'd been using those motions to mock people (who are backpedaling) in general for quite some time Oh, okay. So it's not jus that he's mocking a disabled reporter, but mocks other people as if they were disabled as well. Well, that's just fine, then.
- rrauenza 10y agoYes, I agree (that its not fine, to be clear) -- I'm not even convinced he knew this particular reported was disabled because to him it's just an insignificant reporter's name on a page. His generic mocking just happened to have real consequences this time.