Mainly submitting this because while I usually enjoy The Washington Post's reporting, I feel the chart created in this article is misleading. It's disingenuous

Mainly submitting this because while I usually enjoy The Washington Post's reporting, I feel the chart created in this article is misleading. It's disingenuous to group sleep into "non-work time". For example, 8 hours per night ==> 248 hours in Jan = 62% of "non-work time". Burying that this was done separately from the other listed exceptions to the chart seemed intentional to me — it's effectively a mirage for the author to support his own thesis irrespective of data.