4 ms·
Liberals in USA has reached the level of maniacal stupidity. I love politics and participate in events across the political spectrum. But despite my genuine eff
by tn13 10y ago
Liberals in USA has reached the level of maniacal stupidity. I love politics and participate in events across the political spectrum. But despite my genuine efforts I find the typical left to be completely unfathomable.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jat850 10y agoI get the feeling like the idea behind Sam's experiment was to eliminate the notion of "unfathomable". Listen and discuss, acknowledge the views and beliefs of others where possible as valid, through empathy and open-mindedness. Sure, there are some viewpoints which can be written off as too far off the deep end, but "liberals" are humans with thoughts and opinions, and so are all those who voted for Trump and/or continue to support him. The answers in Sam's interviews make this quite clear. Start trying to fathom instead of just saying you can't?
- alexose 10y agoOut of curiosity, who do you refer to when you say "liberals"? I think of myself as liberal, and I bet we could find plenty of common ground.
- crikli 10y agoIt's important to not confuse liberals with leftists. My liberal friends have remained (for the most part) fairly objective and open to dialogue. My friends who identify as leftists...not so much.
- MrZongle2 10y agoI agree entirely. The Left co-opted the term "liberal" to the detriment of true liberal thinkers in America. Liberals, even if you don't agree with them, are generally interesting people to talk to and (from my experience) often easy to get along with. They, by definition, are willing to entertain alternative ideas and debate them. Leftists, while not all cut from the same cloth, are not a subset of liberals. The BLM and AntiFa movements are clearly illiberal.
- grzm 10y agoI think co-opted is a bit strong. I don't think there's ever been a concerted effort on the left to own the word liberal. If you know of any evidence to the contrary, I'd love to learn about it. I think it's more accidental in that terms end up associated with one side or the other, and in this case the left perhaps had an edge in that it's generally been associated with civil liberties. (Whether or not that can be supported is a separate discussion.) Having effectively two parties in the US results in a lot of incongruities.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- the_gastropod 10y agoMaybe provide some examples of liberal policies you find to be "maniacally stupid". Otherwise, this is pretty baseless.
- cronjobber 10y agoThe Left is not monolithic, it is better understood as a coalition of separate forces with different interests united against a common, feared enemy. What you perceive as "manical stupidity" is fear. Fear of a common enemy is one of the few things that can glue together a diverse coalition.