3 ms·
That's a lot of fun. I'd like to see someone go further with some of the suggestions the author mentions at the end, like weighting the scores by word familiari
by baddox 10y ago
That's a lot of fun. I'd like to see someone go further with some of the suggestions the author mentions at the end, like weighting the scores by word familiarity and word length.
- abecedarius 10y agoI did something like that for multiword anagrams: scoring them by their probability in a word-bigram model of English. It's expensive because I had it pick the best permutation of the words, by brute force. It's far from a measure that could really judge "this is a great anagram", but there are so astronomically many boring ones to filter out that it's still a big help.