3 ms·
> If they didn't have a stack of 100,000 resumes, they would throw this ridiculous process out the window in a heartbeat and actually interview people for the p
by nolemurs 10y ago
> If they didn't have a stack of 100,000 resumes, they would throw this ridiculous process out the window in a heartbeat and actually interview people for the position.
Absolutely.
If they had far fewer resumes then they'd be much less willing to pass on potentially good hires, and more willing to risk bad hires. You make it sound like we're disagreeing, but this is 100% consistent with what I said.
- awfgylbcxhrey 10y agoYou're not saying the same thing at all. Your statement assumes the process eliminates bad hires, while GP's point is clearly that it doesn't. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with either side, but you clearly aren't in agreement.